Sunday, October 4, 2009

Streets, Sex Work, and Safety

The Young Women's Empowerment Project out in Chicago has recently published the results of a youth-led study on harm reduction and recovery strategies in the sex trade. Check out their website or go directly to the pdf file of the research. Chicago Public Radio also covered the release of this study: audio podcast here.

This research is for US. It’s for YOU and for all girls, including transgender girls, and young women, including trans women involved in the sex trade and street economy.

This research study was created by girls, collected by girls, and analyzed by girls. We did this because this is OUR LIVES. Who knows us better than us?

We did this to prove that we care--that we are capable of resisting violence in a multitude of ways.

We take care of ourselves and heal in whatever way feels best for us—whether society approves of it or not.

This research study honors all of the ways we fight back (resistance) and our healing (resilience) methods.

We proved that we do face violence but we are not purely victims. We are survivors. We can take care of ourselves and we know what we need.

This research is a response to all of those researchers, doctors, government officials, social workers, therapists, journalists, foster care workers and every other adult who said we were too messed up or that we needed to be saved from ourselves.


Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Abuse Between the Young and Famous

The presence of celebrity culture is certainly overwhelming as this entry relies mainly on headlines I have come across at news stands and talk from coworkers and friends. I haven't actually read or watched a whole lot on hip-hop and R&B singer Rihanna's alleged ordeal of battery from boyfriend and fellow singer Chris Brown. So my perspective could be misinformed. But if it isn't, then what is proven is that modern society has few, if any, individuals who are capable of remaining ignorant of entertainment news (as I certainly have tried my best at that). And while such mass media is so powerful and far-reaching, its lack of contribution to the quality of life of both its story subjects and consumers mostly goes unquestioned.



Rihanna allegedly sustained beatings from Brown while the couple sat in a parked car less than a day before the 2009 Grammy Awards. As a result, they both cancelled their scheduled performances at the event.


Let's begin by exploring three classic characteristics of partnership dysfunction that have been identified or alleged in Rihanna and Chris Brown's case:

  1. Blaming the Victim

    A few days after the Grammy Awards, a friend told me that Brown had initiated rumors on the internet that he contracted an STD from Rihanna. In addition, the question of infidelity on her part circulated across magazine articles. If these accusations did indeed originate from Brown's efforts, then he has been playing a game of manipulation that partners employ to minimize responsibility and guilt for the abuse they know they're going to inflict in the near future. The misuse of police and court mandates is one such tactic in which the perpetrator attempts in advance to obtain a restraining order on the victim so that their roles eventually appear to be reversed in the eyes of authorities, neighbors, and others. And in the proportionately small percentage of female-on-male violence, a typical outcome is that in the process of defending himself, the man leaves the woman with scratches and bruises which the woman uses as evidence that he was the one committing the assault.

  2. Jekyl and Hyde

    If protecting oneself before carrying out an act of abuse isn't enough, then the process must continue afterward as well. Brown's post-assault strategy at gathering pity towards himself might have been his statements relating his own violent tendencies to what he repeatedly witnessed as a boy: the battery of his mother by a man whom he identified as not being his biological father. In order for such a claim to be worthy of any respect and compassion, it must be followed by a commitment to resolve the trauma towards the goal of preventing more violent tendencies in the future.



    In addition to being charged on two felony counts, Chris Brown received physical threats from fellow celebrities who were more than eager to seek vengeance for Rihanna.


    The unfortunate reality is that in a setting of exposed guilt and indictment, most abusers will exhibit and verbalize whatever qualities of innocence and sympathy they can to escape responsibility for their actions, which would be fine if these qualities - no matter how false - also functioned as a stepping stone towards genuinely trying to reduce their own anger and mistreatment of others. The latter, however, often fizzles away once the smoke has cleared and the pressure has eased off and they have an opportunity to return to their harmful patterns without punitive consequences.


  3. Defending Your Abuser

    The lack of consequences is rooted in what appears to be the most illogical form of dysfunction, mostly because it relies on a choice made by the victim of the violence. It is a horrifyingly tragic and separate matter to be trapped in a relationship and home in which your partner has threatened to wage greater pain on you and your children upon any attempts on your part to break up. Rihanna, so far as anyone knows, is not confined under such fears. She seems to have every opportunity to safely leave Chris Brown, so is she insane to not do so?




    If insanity sounds a bit harsh, then let's raise a comparison to substance addiction, as severe co-dependency is more or less a form of addiction to another human being. And to quote a phrase from the drug recovery community, insanity is "repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results." I am not suggesting, however, that Rihanna necessarily possesses naive hopes that Brown has been or will be reformed so easily. It is just as likely that she actually has no hopes of him changing, and has fully accepted an abusive future with him, in which case she shares the pessimism of men and women around the world who dismiss violence as a normal trait of intimacy and family dynamics.



Furthermore, acceptance of abuse doesn't merely exist at the individual level. This belief system is sometimes adopted and practiced by entire communities attempting to preserve cultural standards as well as its own positive image. As I've learned from experience, Chinese families have a strong tradition of saving face by any means necessary and thus are not immune to this destructive self-defense mechanism. However, this pattern is also strong among African-Americans as black men already suffer the stereotype of being criminally violent, and the tragic outcome is that the community's efforts to prevent the spread of this stereotype includes rationalization and justification by battered women remaining silent and tolerant even in the face of assault by their male counterparts.


With respect to Rihanna and Chris Brown, age is an even more crucial characteristic of theirs to address than race. In fact, Brown is barely a legal adult. Their relative youth strikes me not because I find it hard to believe that young couples would be engaged in co-dependency and violence, but rather because the individuals I am accustomed to seeing opening up and responding to their traumatic relationship experiences are much older. So sadly, what this means - at least from my perspective - is that perpetrators and victims of domestic abuse rarely seek help until years (sometimes decades) into their adult lives.

Whether Rihanna and Brown are pursuing any sort of counseling or treatment - individually or together - is beyond me. Regardless, key factors of success and stardom only complicate whatever decisions they attempt to make. Here are two such factors that come to my mind:

  1. Lack of Privacy

    Needless to say, someone who recently experienced an act of physical abuse with a partner is not likely to be excited about having the unfortunate incident announced to the whole world. By nature of being famous, however, our R&B couple didn't have a choice in this matter. One can reasonably argue that the spotlight provides a source of discipline to the individual who could otherwise act immorally and harmfully without having to answer to anyone for his or her own actions. In other words, when A-list artists screw up, they might face criticism not only from friends and family but also from the media and millions of fans. Such consequences could be effective in setting oneself straight.




    On the other hand, the value of confidentiality cannot be dismissed in the field of violence prevention and crisis intervention. Issues such as relationship abuse and substance addiction are supposed to be personal matters handled at a personal level between the parties involved. So when these matters are exposed in the tabloids, their subjects (particularly the ones who have been famous since youth) won't know or have access to the privacy often required for a safe outreach and treatment process.


  2. Mo' Money, Mo' Problems

    Domestic violence and child abuse are attributed by some social scholars to standards of culture and class. I won't argue with this observation. As a Chinese immigrant, I witnessed firsthand such a relationship both in my immediate family and the larger village community I was born in. Beyond my childhood though, I learned that these issues were neither unique to my family nor low-income households in general, and that money appears to play a very interesting role in the contribution of problems such as child neglect and substance abuse in many upper middle-class families. Perhaps the emphasis on poverty prevention as a means of enabling competent parenting has been misinterpreted by some high-income mothers and fathers who think quality can be measured primarily by quantity (quantity in monetary terms, that is).


    And if Rihanna and Brown lived through any poverty in the past, they certainly aren't doing so now, nor have they for at least the past few years. Their present life should be perfect if we use celebrity news as a criteria. After all, the sentiment is that money equals happiness, and if happiness is synonymous with confidence and fearlessness, then what headlines and magazine covers fail to ask is: can one be too confident and fearless to the point of self-destruction? The rock superstars and high-profile comedians who suffered fatal heroin and cocaine overdoses can certainly be a testament to this point. Theoretically, someone with unlimited funds and resources should have the means to maintain a healthy and safe lifestyle. Realistically, a scenario so rich might also produce a belief of personal invincibility and the inclination to absolve oneself of any control.



For many decades, the American public has been sold on this idea of boundless highs and lows as an attractive lifestyle, and the salesman has been a Hollywood which exaggerates both the positive and negative characteristics of its members. Wealth and beauty are presented with a sense of romance and magic. Success seems to come instantly, and lasts forever. On the other hand, flaws - ranging from trouble with the police to sporting tacky attire on the red carpet - are also deeply publicized, and whether the publicity acts as scrutiny or promotion is debatable. Either way, the role of stardom is forced outside of human terms. Thus, celebrities only exist as superhuman or subhuman, and everything in between is disregarded.


After all, if most of what has been reported on Rihanna's conflict with Brown has been true, then their relationship - for better or for worse - is hardly any different than the majority of abusive relationships in the general population. Young battered women could be served well with stories connecting them to Rihanna's experience. Instead, this experience has been largely reduced to soap opera gossip, leaving nothing of value to the thousands of victims who have suffered a similar trauma.

With all of this said thus far, my observations on this couple could be outrageously inaccurate since my sources include nothing more than magazine covers, one or two online articles, and peer gossip. But if that turns out to be true, then ironically, my assertion not to trust our all-powerful media for reliable information will merely be strengthened. To the credit of the celebrity news business, it is indeed just a business that exists for no other reason than the fact that an audience continues to pay for its products, so the responsibility ultimately falls back on us - the population of private citizens, what we choose to consume, and how we allow our consumption to influence the way we think and live.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

If Police Won't Enforce a Restraining Order...

October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. This is a time when thousands of victims and survivors of this devastating social problem can be granted the recognition and support they would not normally receive from the news. If mainstream headlines continue to favor stories of women in danger based on the subjects' attractiveness and social status, then the strength of Jessica Lenahan (formerly Gonzalez) and the international legal ramifications of her case are sure to be ignored. But where commercial journalism fails, the need for publicity can be met by activists, bloggers, and groups such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.



This week, Lenahan will testify before the continental commission in a case which she has been battling the U.S. criminal justice system on for nearly a decade, and with no success. It all started when Colorado local police refused to enforce a restraining order against her husband, who had kidnapped her three daughters. Any faith in the authorities of America protecting her and her family dwindled even further when the Supreme Court held that the state of Colorado was not responsible for responding to Lenahan's calls for help, even though her husband ended up murdering the three girls. If an individual is enough of a threat that he has been legally issued to stay away from his wife and children, then wouldn't common sense (along with morality and safety) establish that this same legal system be obligated to see the entire process through when additional prevention and protection become necessary?

This is one of the many questions Lenahan is trying to have answered. Here is her story in her own words.



My name is Jessica Lenahan and I am a survivor of domestic violence. On Wednesday I will make my second appearance before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Washington, DC. The IACHR is responsible for promoting and protecting human rights throughout the Americas. I turned to the IACHR three years ago because the justice system in the United States abandoned me.

In June 1999, my estranged husband, Simon Gonzales, abducted my three young daughters in violation of a domestic violence restraining order I had obtained against him three weeks before. I repeatedly contacted and pleaded with the Castle Rock Police for assistance, but they refused to act. Late that night, Simon arrived at the police station and opened fire. He was killed and the bodies of my three girls were found murdered in the cab of his truck.

I sued the town of Castle Rock, Colorado for failing to enforce the restraining order I had against my husband at the time. The case went all the way up to the Supreme Court, but they ruled that the enforcement of a restraining order wasn't mandatory under Colorado law. I felt utterly abandoned: the police had failed in their duty to protect me and my girls, and the government told me there was nothing wrong with that. I was sure that I would never have my day in court or a proper investigation of what happened. I nearly gave up at that point - I had gone all the way to the Supreme Court, and I thought that was the end of the line.

But in December 2005, with the help of the ACLU and the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School, I filed a petition with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In March 2007, I testified before the IACHR - the first time I was allowed to tell my story in a legal forum.

Before this case, I never knew this regional system existed and never thought of my private issues as human rights violations. I am the first survivor of domestic violence to bring an individual complaint against the United States for international human rights violations. I want other people like me out there to know that this system exists to protect all of us, and that our government cannot just turn its back on us and get away with it. Although the U.S. is always pointing its finger at other countries for their human rights violations, there are plenty of violations occurring right here at home. International human rights bodies like the IACHR give U.S. citizens the opportunity to have a voice, particularly those who have lost everything.

It is fitting that my hearing is being held in October, Domestic Violence Awareness Month, an important marker of what continues to be one of the most dangerous issues facing women today.





Thanks to the writers and readers of Feministing for letting me know about this unbelievable case. Here is an article from Chicago on the unfortunate statistics regarding battered women seeking justice in the U.S. legal system. And to the media's credit, here is a video on Lenahan's case which includes some coverage by 60 Minutes.